The Way the Kansas Natives Have Failed to Elect Good Leaders

1. Introduction: The author’s main argument

In his book, “What’s the Matter with Kansas?”, published in 2004, Thomas Frank argues that the native citizens of his home state have failed to elect leaders who can bring about quality governance. He attributes this failure to three main factors: lack of understanding of how the state government works, voting against their own interests, and following the false promises of conservative politicians. While Frank’s analysis is specific to Kansas, it is also relevant to other states in the US where similar dynamics are at play.

2. The way the native citizens of Kansas have failed to elect
leaders who can bring about quality governance

2. 1 Lack of understanding of how the state government works

One of the main reasons why Kansas natives have failed to elect good leaders is because they do not understand how the state government works. This lack of understanding is compounded by the fact that most residents are not actively involved in the political process. As a result, they are easily swayed by ignorant or dishonest politicians who make false promises that they have no intention of keeping.

2. 2 Voting against their own interests

Another reason why Kansas natives have failed to elect good leaders is because they often vote against their own interests. This is due to the fact that many people in the state identify more with their cultural values than with their economic interests. As a result, they are often willing to support politicians who promise to uphold cultural values even if those same politicians end up pursuing policies that hurt the economy.

2. 3 Following the false promises of conservative politicians

The final reason why Kansas natives have failed to elect good leaders is because they have been misled by conservative politicians who make false promises about what they will do if elected. These promises usually involve cutting taxes and regulations, which sounds good on paper but doesn’t always lead to better economic outcomes. In fact, many times these promises simply result in budget deficits and austerity measures that hurt ordinary people while benefiting the wealthy elite.

3. Conclusion: The author’s call to action

In conclusion, Thomas Frank’s book “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” provides a detailed analysis of why the native citizens of his home state have failed to elect quality leaders. While his analysis is specific to Kansas, it is also relevant to other states in the US where similar dynamics are at play. In order to fix this problem, Frank calls on Kansas natives to become more involved in the political process and to vote for candidates who will actually represent their interests.

FAQ

More Related papers

• A Comparison of Christian Baptism and Koranic Verse
• The Benefits of Introducing Information Technology in Neel Taxis Ltd
• The Different Types of Effective Communication
• The Impact of Media Coverage on Voter Perceptions of Hillary Clinton's Femininity in the 2008 Democratic Primary Elections
• Cheating in the Test: Issue Review