The Pros and Cons of Community Policing

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of society, community policing has become an important topic in law enforcement agencies. In many developed countries, such as the United States, Canada, Australia and some European countries, community policing is a common practice in police organizations (Weisburd et al., 2004). According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), community policing is defined as “a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies, which support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder and fear of crime” (IACP, n.d.). In other words, community policing is the involvement of police and the community in the identification and solving of community problems.

The concept of community policing originated in the United States in the 1970s. At that time, due to social unrest, young people’s dissatisfaction with the government and police were at a historic high, which led to an increase in crime rates. In response to this situation, police departments began to implement community policing programs aimed at improving relationships between police and communities and reducing crime rates. Over the past few decades, community policing has been gradually introduced into law enforcement agencies around the world.

2. Defining Community Policing

There is no single definition of community policing; rather, it is defined differently by various scholars and practitioners. However, there are some commonalities in these definitions. First, most definitions emphasize the police-community relationship; that is, community policing is about communication and collaboration between police and communities (Weisburd et al., 2004). Second, many definitions view community policing as a process or method rather than an end result; that is, it is a way for police and communities to work together to identify and solve problems (Braga & Weisburd, 2006). Finally, most definitions see community policing as proactive rather than reactive; that is, it is about taking action to prevent problems from occurring in the first place rather than simply responding to them after they have already happened (IACP, n.d.).

3. Theoretical Foundations of Community Policing

Theoretically, there are two main schools of thought on community policing: social control theory and problem-oriented policing theory. Social control theory posits that crime occurs when there are holes or gaps in social controls; that is, when individuals are not effectively monitored or supervised by parents, teachers, bosses or other authority figures (Cohen & Felson, 1979). To reduce crime under this framework, police need to work with communities to fill these holes or gaps in social controls. Problem-oriented policing theory takes a different approach; it posits that crime occurs when there are opportunities for it (e.g., an unlocked door or window), motivated offenders (e.g., someone with a criminal record) and suitable targets (e.g., someone who is alone and vulnerable) (Clarke & Eck, 2003). To reduce crime under this framework, police need to identify these opportunity factors and take action to remove them.

4. Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Community Policing

research on the effectiveness of community policing has yielded mixed results. Some studies have found that community policing reduces crime (Braga & Weisburd 2006; Weisburd et al., 2004), while others have found that it has no effect on crime (Sousa & Rocha, 2009). However, it is worth noting that the vast majority of these studies have been conducted in developed countries; there is a dearth of research on the effectiveness of community policing in developing countries. In addition, most of the research on community policing has been conducted at the micro level; that is, it has focused on specific programs or initiatives rather than on community policing as a whole. As a result, it is difficult to draw general conclusions about the efficacy of community policing.

5. Implementation Challenges of Community Policing

Despite its potential benefits, community policing faces a number of challenges in terms of implementation. First, it requires a fundamental change in the way police work; instead of reacting to crime after it has already occurred, they need to take proactive measures to prevent it from happening in the first place. This can be a difficult adjustment for police officers who are used to working in a reactive mode. Second, community policing requires police to establish partnerships with a wide range of stakeholders, including government agencies, business leaders, social service organizations and ordinary citizens. These partnerships can be time-consuming and difficult to maintain. Third, community policing requires police to gather and use data to identify crime hotspots and opportunity factors. This can be a challenge for police departments that do not have adequate resources or training. Finally, community policing demands a high level of competence and professionalism from police officers; they need to be able to communicate effectively, solve problems creatively and work collaboratively with others.

6. Conclusion

Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies which support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder and fear of crime. The concept of community policing originated in the United States in the 1970s and has since been adopted by law enforcement agencies around the world. Although research on the effectiveness of community policing has yielded mixed results, it is generally seen as a positive step forward in terms of police-community relations. However, community policing faces a number of challenges in terms of implementation, including a need for fundamental changes in police work, establishing partnerships with stakeholders, gathering and using data, and maintaining a high level of competence and professionalism among police officers.

FAQ

More Related papers

• The Etymology of Words: Definition, History, and Functions
• The Pros and Cons of Canada's First Afro-centric School
• The Dark Side of Human Nature in "Death in Venice" and "Therese Raquin"
• "Sexy women are everywhere: on billboards, magazines, but real women must use the strength of their voices to be heard." -Tony Amos
• The Struggle to Preserve Cultural Identity in the Face of Acculturation: A Comparison of Pat Mora's "Immigrants" and Tahira Naqvi's "Brave We Are"