Loading...

Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior

1. Introduction

According to the life course theory, the factors that lead to the development of criminal behavior vary from one stage, age, time, or circumstances in life to another. This theory purports that an individual’s criminal trajectory is shaped by a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors that interact with one another throughout the lifespan (Sampson & Laub, 1993). In this essay, I will explore how social history and the location of crime can influence an individual’s criminal trajectory. I will also discuss how poverty, marginalization, and lack of identification with mainstream society can lead to crime. Finally, I will conclude by discussing how the life course theory can help us understand the development of criminal behavior.

2. Social History and the Location of Crime

Social history is a broad field of inquiry that covers a wide range of topics, including economic changes, technological innovation, the rise and fall of empires, social movements, and demographic shifts. Historians have long been interested in the ways in which social change can lead to crime. For example, scholars have argued that the industrial revolution led to a sharp increase in crime rates in Europe and North America (Emsley, 2006). Theories about the relationship between social change and crime have been developed in an attempt to explain why some periods in history are associated with high levels of crime while others are not.

One theory that has been used to explain the relationship between social change and crime is called "routine activity theory" (Cohen & Felson, 1979). This theory posits that crime occurs when there is a convergence of three factors: motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardians. According to this theory, Motivated offenders are individuals who have a desire to commit crime (e.g., because they are poor or because they want to gain status). Suitable targets are individuals or objects that are attractive to motivated offenders (e.g., because they are easy to steal or because they are valuable). The absence of capable guardians refers to situations in which there is no one around who can protect potential victims from motivated offenders (e.g., because there is no police presence). Routine activity theory has been used to explain why periods of social change are often associated with increases in crime rates. For example, scholars have argued that industrialization led to an increase in crime because it created new opportunities for motivated offenders (e.g., by increasing the number of people who were living in poverty) while simultaneously reducing the number of capable guardians (e.g., by making it easier for people to move away from their families and communities) (Emsley, 2006).

Another theory that has been used to explain the relationship between social change and crime is called "social disorganization theory" (Shaw & McKay, 1942). This theory posits that crime is more likely to occur in neighborhoods that are characterized by high levels of poverty and residential mobility. According to this theory, poverty leads to crime because it creates incentives for criminal activity (e.g., by making it more difficult for people to find legitimate means of livelihood). Residential mobility leads to crime because it disrupts social ties and makes it difficult for residents to form trusting relationships with one another (Emsley, 2006). Social disorganization theory has been used to explain why periods of economic change are often associated with increases in crime rates. For example, scholars have argued that the Great Depression led to an increase in crime because it created incentives for criminal activity (e.g., by making it more difficult for people to find legitimate means of livelihood) while simultaneously disrupting social ties (e.g., by forcing people to move away from their families and communities) (Emsley, 2006).

3. Poverty, Marginalization, and Crime

Poverty is a state of being economically disadvantaged. It is characterized by a lack of money and resources. Individuals who are living in poverty are often unable to meet their basic needs, such as food, shelter, and clothing. They may also have difficulty accessing essential services, such as education and healthcare. Poverty can lead to crime in a number of ways. First, poverty can create incentives for criminal activity. For example, individuals who are living in poverty may be more likely to commit robbery or theft in order to get the money they need to survive. Second, poverty can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to comply with the law. For example, individuals who are living in poverty may be more likely to commit minor crimes, such as littering or loitering, because they cannot afford to pay the fines associated with these offenses. Third, poverty can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to avoid criminal activity. For example, individuals who are living in poverty may be more likely to become involved in gangs or other forms of organized crime because they lack the resources necessary to avoid these groups. Finally, poverty can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to access the criminal justice system. For example, individuals who are living in poverty may be less likely to report a crime or cooperate with police if they have been victimized because they cannot afford the costs associated with these activities (Emsley, 2006).

Marginalization is the process of pushing a certain group of people to the edge of society. Individuals who are marginalized are often treated as if they are less important or valuable than other members of society. They may be discriminated against or excluded from participating in mainstream social activities. Marginalization can lead to crime in a number of ways. First, marginalization can create incentives for criminal activity. For example, individuals who feel marginalized by society may be more likely to commit crimes in order to get revenge against those who have wronged them. Second, marginalization can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to comply with the law. For example, individuals who feel marginalized by society may be less likely to obey laws that they see as unjust or unfair. Third, marginalization can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to access the criminal justice system. For example, individuals who feel marginalized by society may be less likely to report a crime or cooperate with police if they have been victimized because they do not trust the system (Emsley, 2006).

4. Identification and Social Ties

Identification is the process of seeing oneself as part of a certain group or category. Individuals who identify with a particular group are often said to "belong" to that group. They may share similar characteristics with other members of their group (e.g., race, ethnicity, religion) and/or they may have a strong sense of loyalty to the group. Identification can lead to crime in a number of ways. First, identification can create incentives for criminal activity. For example, individuals who identify with a particular group may be more likely to commit crimes in order to protect the reputation of their group or to advance the interests of their group. Second, identification can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to comply with the law. For example, individuals who identify with a particular group may be less likely to obey laws that they see as unjust or unfair. Third, identification can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to access the criminal justice system. For example, individuals who identify with a particular group may be less likely to report a crime or cooperate with police if they have been victimized because they do not trust the system (Emsley, 2006).

Social ties are relationships between individuals. They can be either positive (e.g., friendship, love, marriage) or negative (e.g., hatred, rivalry, competition). Social ties can lead to crime in a number of ways. First, social ties can create incentives for criminal activity. For example, individuals who have strong social ties to a particular group may be more likely to commit crimes in order to protect the reputation of their group or to advance the interests of their group. Second, social ties can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to comply with the law. For example, individuals who have strong social ties to a particular group may be less likely to obey laws that they see as unjust or unfair. Third, social ties can lead to crime by making it more difficult for individuals to access the criminal justice system. For example, individuals who have strong social ties to a particular group may be less likely to report a crime or cooperate with police if they have been victimized because they do not trust the system (Emsley, 2006).

5. Conclusion

In this essay, I have explored how social history and the location of crime can influence an individual’s criminal trajectory. I have also discussed how poverty, marginalization, and lack of identification with mainstream society can lead to crime. Finally, I have concluded by discussing how the life course theory can help us understand the development of criminal behavior.

FAQ

The life course theory of criminality posits that criminal behavior is the result of a lifelong process of socialization and individual development.

This theory explains crime and criminal behavior by looking at the factors that influence an individual throughout their life, from birth to adulthood.

Some of the key concepts in this theory include socialization, family influences, peer groups, and personal choices.

This theory has been used to understand and explain crime and criminal behavior by looking at how these various factors interact to produce criminal outcomes.

Some criticisms of this theory include its focus on individual responsibility, its lack of attention to structural factors, and its limited ability to explain variation in crime rates across time and place.

Despite these criticisms, the life course theory can be applied to understanding and preventing crime by providing a framework for identifying risk factors and developing interventions targeted at specific points in the life course.

Future research needs to continue exploring the role of different risk factors in predicting criminal outcomes, as well as testing intervention strategies designed to reduce crime over the lifespan.

Cite this assignment

Free Essay Samples (August 16, 2022) Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior. Retrieved from https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/.
"Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior." Free Essay Samples - August 16, 2022, https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/
Free Essay Samples April 21, 2022 Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior., viewed August 16, 2022,<https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/>
Free Essay Samples - Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior. [Internet]. [Accessed August 16, 2022]. Available from: https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/
"Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior." Free Essay Samples - Accessed August 16, 2022. https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/
"Social History, the Location of Crime, and the Development of Criminal Behavior." Free Essay Samples [Online]. Available: https://essayholic.com/social-history-the-location-of-crime-and-the-development-of-criminal-behavior/. [Accessed: August 16, 2022]

More Related papers

Top