The ethical considerations of IVF treatment and the case of Nadya Suleman

1. Introduction

In 2008, Nadya Suleman, who was then 33 years old, made headlines around the world when she gave birth to octuplets (eight babies at once). This was the result of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment which she had undergone. While IVF is generally considered to be a safe and successful fertility treatment, there are risks associated with multiple births and prematurity, as was the case with Ms. Suleman’s babies. In addition, there are ethical considerations in implanting the embryos, which will be discussed in this paper. Ms. Suleman’s case will also be examined to see if the removal of the children from her care by child welfare services is proper.

2. The ethical considerations of implanting embryos

There are a number of ethical considerations when it comes to implanting embryos during IVF treatment. These include the process of implantation itself, selective reduction and the moral status of the embryo.

-The process of implantation
During IVF treatment, eggs are retrieved from the woman’s ovaries and fertilized with sperm in a laboratory dish. The resulting embryos are then implanted into the woman’s uterus (womb) in the hope that they will attach themselves to the uterine wall and grow. However, not all embryos will implant successfully and some may be of poor quality and not develop properly. In order to increase the chances of success, more than one embryo may be implanted. This can lead to risks associated with multiple births and prematurity, as was the case with Ms. Suleman’s babies.

-Selective reduction
If more than one embryo implants successfully, this is known as a multiple pregnancy. While some couples may want to have more than one baby, others may opt for selective reduction. This is a procedure where one or more of the embryos are terminated so that the remaining fetus or fetuses have a better chance of surviving. Selective reduction is a controversial procedure and there are ethical considerations on both sides of the debate. Some people believe that it is morally wrong to terminate a pregnancy, even if it is for medical reasons. Others believe that it is morally permissible to terminate a pregnancy if it means saving the life of another fetus or reducing the risk of health complications for the mother or child.

-Moral status of the embryo
Another ethical consideration when it comes to IVF is the moral status of the embryo. There is debate about when human life begins and whether an embryo should be given full moral status from the moment of conception or not. Some people believe that an embryo should be given full moral status from the moment of conception because it has the potential to develop into a human being. Others believe that an embryo does not have full moral status until it has developed sufficiently to be considered sentient or self-aware. This debate has ethical implications for how we should treat embryos during IVF treatment and what kind of research should be conducted on them.

3. Ms. Suleman’s case – is the removal of the children proper?

Ms. Suleman’s case raises a number of ethical considerations, including the risks associated with multiple births and prematurity, the welfare support she received and the removal of her children from her care.

-Risks associated with multiple births and prematurity
As mentioned previously, there are risks associated with multiple births and prematurity. These risks include health complications for the mother and child, as well as emotional and financial strain on the family. In Ms. Suleman’s case, her babies were born premature and had to spend several weeks in hospital. This put a strain on her emotionally and financially. In addition, there were concerns about her ability to care for her octuplets given that she already had six other young children at home.

-Support for Ms. Suleman and her children
Ms. Suleman received a lot of public support when she gave birth to her octuplets. However, there were also some people who criticized her for having so many children when she could not afford to care for them properly. There was also criticism of the fertility doctor who had treated her, Dr. Michael Kamrava. He was accused of being irresponsible in implantating so many embryos into her uterus. In response to the criticism, a number of organizations set up fundraising campaigns to support Ms. Suleman and her children.

-Removal of the children from Ms. Suleman’s care
In 2013, child welfare services in Los Angeles County removed Ms. Suleman’s octuplets from her care after they found that she was not providing them with adequate food, shelter or medical care. The children were placed in the care of their grandparents. While some people applauded child welfare services for taking action, others criticized them for intervening in what they saw as a private family matter.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, there are a number of ethical considerations when it comes to IVF treatment and implanting embryos. These include the process of implantation itself, selective reduction and the moral status of the embryo. In addition, there are risks associated with multiple births and prematurity which need to be considered when deciding whether or not to undergo IVF treatment.

FAQ

More Related papers

• The Advantages and Disadvantages of Behavior Targeting
• The Religious and Cultural Diversity of the Chesapeake Bay
• The Character Education Program: A Program to Help Instructors Understand Their Students' Characters
• The JFK International Airport: A World-Class Experience
• The Social Research Process: From Topic Selection to Data Analysis