Loading...

The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm

1. 0 Introduction

Mr. Charles Dempsey had been charged with one count of robbery with violence and one count of causing bodily harm to Mr. George Michael. The trial took place in the High Court at Auckland before Justice Woolford and a jury.

2. 0 The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey

2.1 The charges against Mr. Dempsey

Mr. Dempsey was charged with one count of robbery with violence and one count of causing bodily harm to Mr. George Michael.

The basis of the charge of robbery with violence was that, on or about the 1st of August, 1988, at Kempton Park in England, Mr. Dempsey had stolen a car from Mr. Michael by force and with threats of violence.

The basis of the charge of causing bodily harm to Mr. Michael was that, on or about the 1st of August, 1988, at Kempton Park in England, Mr. Dempsey had caused grievous bodily harm to Mr. Michael by hitting him on the head with a blunt instrument.

2. 2 The facts of the case

The relevant facts were as follows:

On or about the 1st of August, 1988, at Kempton Park in England, Mr. Dempsey had gone to the home of Mr. Michael and had asked him for money owed to him by way of payment for some installments on a car which he had sold to Mr. Michael some months earlier. When Mr. Michael refused to pay the installments, Mr Keys stole his car keys from him and took his car without his consent. He then drove off in the car whilst Mr Michael ran after him shouting for help. A number of passers-by saw what was happening but no one intervened until after Mr Dempsey had stopped the car and got out. At that stage, Mr Michael managed to get hold of the car keys from him but when he tried to drive away, Mr Dempsey chased after him and hit him on the head with a blunt instrument, causing grievous bodily harm.
3 Walter Smith and Alistair Campbell, who were passing by in separate cars at the time, both stopped and intervened.

3. 0 The legal proceedings

3.1 The trial

At the trial, Mr. Dempsey admitted that he had taken the car without consent but claimed that he had done so in order to recover money owed to him by Mr. Michael and that he had not used force or threatened violence. He also claimed that he had hit Mr. Michael on the head in self-defence after Mr. Michael had attacked him.

The jury rejected Mr. Dempsey’s claim of self-defence and found him guilty of both charges.

3. 2 The sentencing

Justice Woolford sentenced Mr. Dempsey to two years’ imprisonment on the charge of robbery with violence and to six months’ imprisonment on the charge of causing grievous bodily harm, to be served concurrently. He also ordered that the car be returned to Mr. Michael.

4. 0 Analysis and discussion

4.1 The issue of self-defence

The issue of self-defence is a complex one and can be difficult to determine in any given case. In this case, the jury rejected Mr. Dempsey’s claim of self-defence and found him guilty of both charges.

There are a number of factors which could have influenced the jury’s decision, including the fact that Mr. Dempsey had entered Mr. Michael’s property without permission, that he had stolen the car keys from him and taken his car without his consent, and that he had hit Mr. Michael on the head with a blunt instrument after he had stopped the car and got out, causing grievous bodily harm.

4. 2 The issue of causation

The issue of causation is also relevant in this case. Mr. Dempsey argued that he had only hit Mr. Michael on the head in self-defence after Mr. Michael had attacked him. However, the jury found that he had caused grievous bodily harm to Mr. Michael by hitting him on the head with a blunt instrument and found him guilty of both charges.

It is possible that the jury took into account the fact that Mr. Dempsey had hit Mr. Michael on the head with a blunt instrument after he had stolen his car keys and taken his car without his consent, and that this was what caused grievous bodily harm to him, rather than anything which Mr. Michael may have done during the course of the incident.

5. 0 Conclusion

In conclusion, Mr. Charles Dempsey was found guilty of both charges against him and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment on the charge of robbery with violence and to six months’ imprisonment on the charge of causing grievous bodily harm, to be served concurrently. He was also ordered to return the car to Mr. Michael.

FAQ

Mr. Charles Dempsey was charged with embezzlement.

The court case against him unfolded over the course of several months, during which time Mr. Dempsey maintained his innocence.

Ultimately, the court found Mr. Dempsey guilty and he was sentenced to five years in prison.

Cite this assignment

Free Essay Samples (August 17, 2022) The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm. Retrieved from https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/.
"The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm." Free Essay Samples - August 17, 2022, https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/
Free Essay Samples June 20, 2022 The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm., viewed August 17, 2022,<https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/>
Free Essay Samples - The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm. [Internet]. [Accessed August 17, 2022]. Available from: https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/
"The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm." Free Essay Samples - Accessed August 17, 2022. https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/
"The case of Mr. Charles Dempsey: robbery, violence and causing bodily harm." Free Essay Samples [Online]. Available: https://essayholic.com/the-case-of-mr-charles-dempsey-robbery-violence-and-causing-bodily-harm/. [Accessed: August 17, 2022]

More Related papers

Top