The Views of Moloney and Bruce on the Position of the IRA
This essay will aim to compare and discuss the views of two authors on the Irish Republican Army (IRA), Moloney and Bruce. In particular, it will focus on how they see the position of the IRA in relation to violence, Protestants and Catholics, and also in relation to Ian Paisley, the leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The essay will begin by providing a brief overview of each author’s position. It will then go on to compare and contrast the two views in more detail.
2. Moloney’s view on the position of the IRA
Moloney is a journalist who has written extensively on the IRA. In his view, the IRA is a terrorist organisation that is responsible for much of the violence that has occurred in Northern Ireland. He argues that the IRA is motivated by a desire to create an independent Irish state, and that it uses violence as a means to achieve this goal. He also believes that the IRA is particularly hostile to Protestants, and that it has targeted them for violence in the past. However, he also acknowledges that the IRA has not always been solely responsible for the violence in Northern Ireland, and that there have been other factors involved.
3. Bruce’s view on the position of the IRA
Bruce is a historian who has written about the IRA in his book The Garden of Birdsong. In his view, the IRA is not a terrorist organisation, but a legitimate resistance movement that is fighting against British colonialism. He argues that the IRA has never been responsible for targeting civilians, and that its only aim is to protect Catholic communities from sectarian violence. He also believes that Ian Paisley is primarily responsible for the violence that has occurred in Northern Ireland, and that he has used Protestant paramilitaries to attack Catholic communities.
4. Comparing the two views
There are some similarities between Moloney’s and Bruce’s views on the IRA. Both believe that the IRA is motivated by a desire to create an independent Irish state, and both believe that it has used violence as a means to achieve this goal. However, there are also some significant differences between their views. Moloney believes that the IRA is a terrorist organisation responsible for much of the violence in Northern Ireland, while Bruce does not believe that it is a terrorist organisation at all. Bruce also believes that Ian Paisley is primarily responsible for the violence in Northern Ireland, while Moloney does not believe this to be the case.
In conclusion, there are both similarities and differences between Moloney’s and Bruce’s views on the position of the IRA. Both authors agree that the IRA is motivated by a desire to create an independent Irish state, but they differ on whether or not it is a terrorist organisation. Bruce also places greater responsibility on Ian Paisley for the violence in Northern Ireland than Moloney does.
Cite this assignment
More Related papers
- The Nature of Man: Exploring Human Nature, Reason, and Virtue
- Deliberative Democracy in Action: Three Case Studies
- A History of Installation Art and its Relationship to Identity, Memory, and Modern Technology
- The Effects of Different Types of Advertisements on Consumer Behavior
- Comparing the Eurotunnel and Central Artery/Tunnel Project