The Government’s Inefficiency in Responding to Hurricane Katrina

1. Introduction

Hurricane Katrina was one of the deadliest and most destructive hurricanes that hit the United States in 2005. The hurricane left a devastating impact on not just the city of New Orleans but also the whole state of Louisiana. Many people lost their homes, jobs, and belongings. Even today, many people are still struggling to rebuild their lives. The main reason why Hurricane Katrina was so destructive was due to the fact that the levees, which were supposed to protect the city from flooding, failed. As a result, 80% of New Orleans was flooded.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, there was a lot of finger-pointing and blame game going on. Many people blamed the government for not doing enough to protect the people from the disaster. Others blamed the people for not following evacuation orders. However, what everyone can agree on is that Hurricane Katrina was a major failure on the part of the government. There were many government officials who were supposed to be responsible for the safety of the people but failed miserably in their jobs.

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the various cause and effects of governmental inefficiencies in addressing the ways that could have been used in preventing such disasters as Hurricane Katrina.

2. Various Causes of Government Inefficiency in Responding to Natural Disasters

There are many causes of government inefficiency in responding to natural disasters. One of the main causes is racism. Racism played a big role in how Hurricane Katrina was handled by the government. It has been well-documented that African Americans have always been treated unfairly by the government. They have always been given less resources and funding than white Americans. This is why many African Americans were skeptical of how much help they would actually get from the government after Hurricane Katrina hit.

Another cause of government inefficiency is political culture. The way that politicians interact with each other can often times be more harmful than helpful. For example, during Hurricane Katrina, there was a lot of finger-pointing going on between different levels of government about who was responsible for what. This did nothing but delay aid and assistance to those who needed it most.

Lastly, another cause of government efficiency is bureaucracy. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is supposed to be responsible for assisting people during times of disaster but they are often bogged down by bureaucratic red tape. This makes it difficult for them to provide timely assistance to those who need it most.

3. The Effect of Government Inefficiency in Responding to Natural Disasters

The effect of government inefficiency in responding to natural disasters can be seen in many different ways. One way is through loss of life. In Hurricane Katrina, there were over 1,800 fatalities as a result of the storm and subsequent flooding. If the government had been more efficient in their response, then perhaps some lives could have been saved.

Another way that governmental inefficiencies can be seen is through property damage. The damage caused by Hurricane Katrina is estimated to be around $108 billion dollars. This is one of the highest totals for any natural disaster in United States history. Once again, if the government had been more efficient in their response, then perhaps some of this damage could have been prevented or at least minimized.

Lastly, another way that governmental inefficiencies can be seen is through the mental and emotional toll that it takes on people. Many people who survived Hurricane Katrina are still struggling to rebuild their lives. They have lost everything and are starting from scratch. This can take a toll on someone mentally and emotionally.

4. Recommendations for Improving Governmental Efficiencies in Responding to Natural Disasters
There are many recommendations for improving governmental efficiencies in responding to natural disasters. One recommendation is to improve communication between different levels of government. During Hurricane Katrina, there was a lot of finger-pointing going on between different levels of government about who was responsible for what. This did nothing but delay aid and assistance to those who needed it most. If communication is improved, then perhaps aid and assistance can be provided more efficiently.

Another recommendation is to provide more resources and funding to agencies such as FEMA. As mentioned before, FEMA is often bogged down by bureaucratic red tape. This makes it difficult for them to provide timely assistance to those who need it most. If more resources and funding are provided, then perhaps FEMA will be able to provide more efficient assistance.

Lastly, another recommendation is to create a national disaster plan. Currently, there is no national disaster plan in place. Each state has their own disaster plan but there is no central plan that all states can follow. This can often times lead to confusion and delays in assistance. If a national disaster plan is created, then perhaps assistance can be provided more efficiently and effectively.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, Hurricane Katrina was a major failure on the part of the government. There were many government officials who were supposed to be responsible for the safety of the people but failed miserably in their jobs. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the various cause and effects of governmental inefficiencies in addressing the ways that could have been used in preventing such disasters as Hurricane Katrina.

FAQ

More Related papers

• The impact of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe on architecture in the United States of America
• The Shallow Lives of the Upper Class in "Play It as It Lays" and "Less Than Zero"
• The Role of College Student Development Theories in Undergraduate Life
• The Engineering School Conceptual Design: A Blueprint for Success
• The Clan of One-Breasted Women: A Story of the Impacts of Politics and Power