Loading...

The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation

1. What are ethics of belief?

Ethics of belief are the standards which need to be kept in mind before the development of faith in something. This concept was presented for the first time in the 19th century by William Kingdon Clifford. The main representatives of this theory are W.K. Clifford, C.S. Peirce, W. James, A.N. Whitehead, and Bertrand Russell. The key ideas of the theory are:
– the duty of evidence;
-the danger of unreasonable beliefs;
-the importance of skepticism;
-the priority of logic over faith;
-the need for always being ready to revise one’s beliefs in the light of new evidence.

The evaluation of the theory is ambiguous: some philosophers consider it to be one of the most important contributions to epistemology, while others think that it is oversimplified and does not take into account all the factors which influence the formation of beliefs.

2. The history of the development of this concept

The concept of ethics of belief was first introduced by William Kingdon Clifford in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). In this work, Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

C.S. Peirce also discussed this problem in his essay “The Fixation of Belief” (1877). Peirce came to a similar conclusion as Clifford, but he thought that there were different types of beliefs, and not all of them needed to be supported by evidence. For example, Peirce considered religious beliefs to be “overruled” by emotions and instincts, and he thought that it was not necessary to provide evidence for them.

W. James also discussed this problem in his essay “The Will to Believe” (1897). James thought that there were some cases when it was morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a sick person who believes that a certain medicine will cure him even though there is no scientific proof for this belief. James concludes that in this case, the belief itself can have a positive effect and help the person recover from his illness.

Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell also discussed this problem in their joint work “Principia Mathematica” (1910-1913). They came to a similar conclusion as James: they thought that there were some cases when it was morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence if this belief had a positive effect on the person’s life.

3. The main representatives of this theory

The main representatives of this theory are William Kingdon Clifford, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Alfred North Whitehead, and Bertrand Russell.

William Kingdon Clifford was an English mathematician and philosopher who first introduced the concept of ethics of belief in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). In this work, Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

Charles Sanders Peirce was an American philosopher who also discussed this problem in his essay “The Fixation of Belief” (1877). Peirce came to a similar conclusion as Clifford, but he thought that there were different types of beliefs, and not all of them needed to be supported by evidence. For example, Peirce considered religious beliefs to be “overruled” by emotions and instincts, and he thought that it was not necessary to provide evidence for them.

William James was an American philosopher and psychologist who discussed this problem in his essay “The Will to Believe” (1897). James thought that there were some cases when it was morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a sick person who believes that a certain medicine will cure him even though there is no scientific proof for this belief. James concludes that in this case, the belief itself can have a positive effect and help the person recover from his illness.

Alfred North Whitehead was an English mathematician and philosopher who also discussed this problem in his joint work with Bertrand Russell “Principia Mathematica” (1910-1913). They came to a similar conclusion as James: they thought that there were some cases when it was morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence if this belief had a positive effect on the person’s life.

4. The key ideas of the theory

The key ideas of this theory are:

– the duty of evidence;
-the danger of unreasonable beliefs;
-the importance of skepticism;
-the priority of logic over faith;
-the need for always being ready to revise one’s beliefs in the light of new evidence.

The duty of evidence is the idea that one should not believe something on insufficient evidence. This idea was first introduced by William Kingdon Clifford in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

The danger of unreasonable beliefs is the idea that believing something on insufficient evidence can lead to negative consequences. This idea was first introduced by Clifford in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

The importance of skepticism is the idea that one should be skeptical about their beliefs and be always ready to revise them in the light of new evidence. This idea was first introduced by Clifford in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

The priority of logic over faith is the idea that one should not believe something on faith, if there is no logical proof for this belief. This idea was first introduced by Clifford in his essay “The Ethics of Belief” (1877). Clifford argues that it is never morally permissible to believe something on insufficient evidence. He uses the example of a shipowner who sends his ship to sea without properly checking it, resulting in the death of all aboard. Clifford concludes that the shipowner acted immorally, because he allowed his beliefs (that the ship was seaworthy) to influence his actions, without taking into account sufficient evidence.

5. The evaluation of the theory

The evaluation of this theory is ambiguous: some philosophers consider it to be one of the most important contributions to epistemology, while others think that it is oversimplified and does not take into account all the factors which influence the formation of beliefs.

Those who consider this theory to be important think that it makes a valuable contribution to epistemology, because it emphasizes the need for always being ready to revise one’s beliefs in the light of new evidence.

Those who think that this theory is oversimplified argue that it does not take into account all the factors which influence the formation of beliefs. For example, it does not take into account the emotions and instincts which play a role in the formation of religious beliefs.

FAQ

The definition of «belief» is a mental representation of an attitude towards something, typically one that is considered to be true.

Some ethical considerations surrounding beliefs include whether the belief is harmful or discriminatory, and whether it respects the autonomy of others.

Our beliefs affect our actions and decisions by influencing how we see the world and what we think is possible or desirable.

It may be morally permissible to hold a belief that we know to be false if doing so is necessary to avoid greater harm or if it would not significantly impact other people's lives.

Cite this assignment

Free Essay Samples (August 16, 2022) The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation. Retrieved from https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/.
"The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation." Free Essay Samples - August 16, 2022, https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/
Free Essay Samples May 25, 2022 The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation., viewed August 16, 2022,<https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/>
Free Essay Samples - The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation. [Internet]. [Accessed August 16, 2022]. Available from: https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/
"The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation." Free Essay Samples - Accessed August 16, 2022. https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/
"The Ethics of Belief: A History and Evaluation." Free Essay Samples [Online]. Available: https://essayholic.com/the-ethics-of-belief-a-history-and-evaluation/. [Accessed: August 16, 2022]

More Related papers

Top